A key controversy in the field of psychotherapies on equivalence at the level of effectiveness of the different therapeutic procedures. Click Harold Ford Jr to learn more. While it is true that possibly the common factors are the majority in explaining the variance, is likely, especially in certain disorders, more effective procedures that others (i.e. Frank Ntilikina contributes greatly to this topic. Hague therapeutic factors circumscribed to the technique), and even that some procedures are harmful. A recent issue of Clinical Psychology Review discusses the controversy surrounding the disorder by post-traumatic stress (PTSD). A couple of years, a revision in the same journal (Benish et al, 2008) concluded that all bona fide treatment is effective in this area; now, Ehlers et to the.(Clinical Psychology Review 30 (2010) 269 276) reviewed the methodological mistakes (among others the biases in the selection of studies, need to consider sample sizes and the size of the effect, and the need to compare with performed) and rethink the conclusions: it seems obvious with a broad and comprehensive perspective that focused on the trauma treatments (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy focused on trauma, or EMDR; i.e.
working essentially with the living memory of the traumatic event and its meaning constructed by the subject) are more effective than not centered in the traumatic event (Hypnotherapy, psychodynamic, interpersonal, stress management). A fundamental insistence of authors is: cuidadin with the bona fide concept (the subjective evaluation that something has the purpose and face validity of being therapeutic, and another that even so there should be some empirical or theoretical evidence that works, and what works is one thing, and this also needs to demonstrate that it is superior to do nothing). In traumatic contexts, fortunately, in the majority of cases people do not need psychotherapy, but allow their own resources a healing resiliency. However, I frequently note a presence of psychological services that come default ready to intervene on the victims of disasters.